Oldest dated roof thus far in Britain http://www.dendrochronology.net/gloucestershire.asp#KEMPLEY1
Story from http://www.dendrochronology.net/gloucestershire.asp#KEMPLEY1
KEMPLEY, Church of St Mary (SO 670 321)
Felling date range: 1120-1150
(a) Nave roof
Rafters 1105; 1108 (H/S); 1108 (H/S); 1111 (H/S); 1114 (H/S); Sole pieces (6/8) 1104; 1105 (H/S); 1107 (H/S); 1108; 1112; 1114 (3); Struts (re-used lower collars) 1105; 1106. Site Master 1036-1114 KEMPLEY1 (t=7.8 WSTNSTOW; 7.6 BORDESLY; 7.3 MONMOUTH)
(b) West door
Felling date range: 1114-1144
Planks 1083 (+20 NM); 1099 (+4 NM to H/S bdy). Site Master 959-1099 KEMPLEY2 (t=8.7 VINTNER; 8.4 THAMESEX; 8.3 WALES97)
(c) Repairs to nave roof east gable
Felling date range: 1357-1387
Rafters (1/2) 1346 (H/S); Ashlar 1345 (H/S). Site Master 1290-1346 KEMPLEY3 (t=8.1 SOUTH; 7.8 SENG98; 7.3 READING)
(d) Dug-out parish chest
Felling date range: 1492-1522
Log radii 1443; 1466; 1468; 1436 (+46 NM to H/S bdy); 1452 (+28 NM to H/S bdy). Site Master 1329-1468 KEMPLEY4 (t=7.2 WICK; 6.8 COMMDERY; 6.7 HERE14C)
KEMPLEY, Church of St Mary (SO 670 321) OxCal update.
Felling date range: 1128-1132 (OxCal; unrefined 1120-1150 (roof); 1114-1144 (door))
This church has the oldest in-situ roof so far identified in Britain. The original date (VA 30, 99) has been refined using OxCal, treating the roof and the door as a single assemblage.
The roof of the nave consists of fifteen internal trusses dated to 1120-50 plus an external rafter-couple which was a late medieval repair, dating to between 1357 to 1387. The fifteen internal trusses are formed using lap-dovetail joints, apart from where the rafters pass over the sole-pieces where a halving joint has been employed. Each truss originally consisted of a pair of rafters, an upper collar and lower collar, sole pieces and ashlars. The collars were connected to each other and to the rafters with small-scantling struts. Inscribed dates of 1670 and 1671 mark the insertion of the present timber ceiling of the nave which necessitated the removal of the lower collars and struts. Many of these collars have been cut into shorter lengths and re-used as raking struts from the new ceiling to the rafters. The nave roof was extensively repaired in the early 1980s, when the use of tree-ring dating for standing buildings was just beginning in England. Sixteen samples from timbers with potential for dating were collected from offcuts of repaired timbers, recorded, and placed in storage. Subsequent detailed recording of the offcuts for English Heritage have revealed a fascinating series of important carpentry details, the most interesting being the use of a fully-developed mortice-and-tenon joint for one of the ashlars into a sole piece, the earliest thus far recorded in the British Isles.
As well as the roof, both the south door of the nave and the west door into the tower appear to be primary Norman carpentry. The door between the nave and the west tower is comprised of three vertical planks of oak originally fastened together with four slip-tenons per joint and four bands of iron on the outside face. The three boards are tapered to reflect the thickening of the tree towards the butt end; the southern and middle planks are aligned with the butt of the tree at the bottom, whereas the north plank has been reversed with the butt of the tree at the top. The felling date range of one plank of 1114-1144 fits well with that for the roof of 1120-1150.
The Kempley Chest has been formed by hollowing out a large log which would have originated from a tree four feet in diameter. The top has been rebated 2 inches to receive a curved elm lid, and both the chest and the chest are bound in iron. The felling date range of between 1492 and 1522 for the church chest is surprising given its simple, even crude, method of construction. The dating was commissioned by English Heritage and carried out in conjunction with Cathy Groves of Sheffield University. For further information see Miles, D H, Worthington, M J, and Groves, C M 1999 Tree-ring analysis of the nave roof, west door, and parish chest from the Church of St Mary, Kempley, Gloucestershire AML Report, 36/99 (Miles and Worthington 1999, VA 30, list 100) (Miles, Worthington, and Bridge 2008, VA 39, list 203)
English Heritage’s page for St Mary’s Church
Story from http://www.dendrochronology.net/gloucestershire.asp#KEMPLEY1
An archaeological story from the Gaurdian about the Black Death
Black Death study lets rats off the hook
From http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/17/black-death-rats-off-hook
Plague of 1348-49 spread so fast in London the carriers had to be humans not black rats, says archaeologist
Bubonic plague victims of 14th century London, uncovered in the 1980s in an excavation at the Old Royal Mint. Photograph: Rex Features
Maev Kennedy The Guardian, Wed 17 Aug 2011 19.37 BST
Rats weren’t the carriers of the plague after all. A study by an archaeologist looking at the ravages of the Black Death in London, in late 1348 and 1349, has exonerated the most famous animal villains in history.
“The evidence just isn’t there to support it,” said Barney Sloane, author of The Black Death in London. “We ought to be finding great heaps of dead rats in all the waterfront sites but they just aren’t there. And all the evidence I’ve looked at suggests the plague spread too fast for the traditional explanation of transmission by rats and fleas. It has to be person to person – there just isn’t time for the rats to be spreading it.”
He added: “It was certainly the Black Death but it is by no means certain what that disease was, whether in fact it was bubonic plague.”
Sloane, who was previously a field archaeologist with the Museum of London, working on many medieval sites, is now attached to English Heritage. He has concluded that the spread of the 1348-49 plague, the worst to hit the capital, was far faster, with an impact far worse than had been estimated previously.
While some suggest that half the city’s population of 60,000 died, he believes it could have been as high as two-thirds. Years later, in 1357, merchants were trying to get their tax bill cut on the grounds that a third of all property in the city was lying empty.
Sloane spent nearly 10 years researching his book, poring over records and excavation reports. Many records have gone missing, while there was also a documentation shortfall as disaster overwhelmed the city. Names of those buried in three emergency cemeteries seem not to have been recorded.
However, Sloane found a valuable resource in records from the Court of Hustings, of wills made and then enacted during the plague years. As the disease gripped – in October 1348 rather than the late summer others suggested, reaching its height in April 1349 – the numbers of wills soared as panic-striken wealthy citizens realised their deaths were probably imminent.
On 5 February 1349 Johanna Ely, her husband already dead, arranged provision for her children, Richard and Johanna. She left them property, spelled out which beds and even pots and pans each was to receive, and placed them in the guardianship of her own mother. She was dead within 72 hours.
It appeared to the citizens that everyone in the world might die. Richard de Shordych left goods and money to his son Benedict when he died in early March: his son outlived him by a fortnight.
Money, youth, and formerly robust good health were no protection. Edward III’s own daughter, Joan, sailed for Spain with her trousseau, her dowry and her bridesmaids, to marry Pedro, heir to the throne of Castile. She would never see her wedding day as she died of the plague within 10 days of landing.
John of Reading, a monk in Westminster, left one of the few witness accounts. He described deaths happening so fast there was “death without sorrow, marriage without affection, self-imposed penance, want without poverty, and flight without escape”.
In Rochester, William of Dene wrote that nobody could be found to bury the dead, “but men and women carried the bodies of their own little ones to church on their shoulders and threw them into mass graves from which arose such a stink that it was barely possible for anyone to go past a churchyard”.
Sloane estimates that people living near the cemetery at Aldersgate, which is now buried under Charterhouse Square, in Smithfield, would have seen a corpse carried past every five minutes at the height of the plague.
As many wills were being made in a week as in a normal year. Usually these would only be activated months or years later: in the worst weeks of the plague there was barely time to get them written down. Many, like Johanna Ely, probably made their wills when they felt the first dreaded sweats and cramps of the disease. Others left property and the care of their children to people who then barely outlived them.
The archaeology of the plague also reveals that most people, however, were buried with touching care, neatly laid out in rows, heads facing west, with far more bodies put in coffins than in most medieval cemeteries – but possibly through fear of infection.
Only a few jumbled skeletons hint at burials carried out some time after death and decomposition; those cases probably arose because bodies were found later on in buildings where every member of the household had died.
Sloane believes there was little difference in mortality rates between rich and poor, because they lived so closely packed together. The plague, he is convinced, spread from person to person in the crowded city.
Mortality continued to rise throughout the bitterly cold winter, when fleas could not have survived, and there is no evidence of enough rats.
Black rat skeletons have been found at 14th-century sites, but not in high enough numbers to make them the plague carriers, he said.
In sites beside the Thames, where most of the city’s rubbish was dumped and rats should have swarmed, and where the sodden ground preserves organic remains excellently, few black rats have been found.
Sloane wants to dig up Charterhouse, where he believes 20,000 bodies lie under the ancient alms houses and modern buildings, including the Art Deco block where the fictional character Hercule Poirot lives in the television series. And, if anyone finds a mass medieval rat grave, he would very much like to know.
How A Robot Fingertip 3-D Sensor Could Change Forensics, Medicine Forever
How A Robot Fingertip 3-D Sensor Could Change Forensics, Medicine Forever – http://pulse.me/s/15o4W
Android
I am presently testing the pros and cons of using an android tablet for Archaeology.
I have just updated to the new Honeycomb 3.1. Its so much smoother. I really think it is better than the ipad!
Will update soon